JCR Japan College of Rheumatology-
有限責任中間法人 日本リウマチ学会
  会員専用ページ

トップページ
学会案内
沿革
定款
役員・委員会
名誉会員・評議員
学術集会
総会学術集会
歴代総会・学術集会
支部・学術集会
学会教育研修会
国際関連学会
認定制度
リウマチ専門医
リウマチ指導医
教育施設
学会出版物
学会誌MR
NLリウマチ
リウマチ学用語集
会員手続き
本サイトについて
よくある質問
関連リンク集
サイトマップ
プライバシー

MODERN RHEUMATOLOGY Vol.16 No.6

Vol.16 No.6に戻る


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Differences in osteoclast formation between proximal and distal tibial osteoporosis in rats with adjuvant arthritis: inhibitory effects of bisphosphonates on osteoclasts

Authors

Goukei Shu1, Kaname Yamamoto1 and Masakazu Nagashima1

(1) Department of Joint Disease and Rheumatism, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan
Received:

February 1, 2006

Accepted:

July 19, 2006

Full Text

> Click Here (member's only)

Abstract

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis commonly suffer both systemic and periarticular osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates (BPs) are inhibitors of bone resorption, and several derivatives have been developed for treatment of enhanced bone resorption. We aimed to characterize osteoclast formation in two different sites, the proximal tibial and distal tibial areas, in rats with adjuvant arthritis, and to investigate the impact of amino or non-amino types of bisphosphonate. Adjuvant arthritis was initiated in rats while administering daily injections of either etidronate, a non-amino BP, or alendronate, an amino BP, for 3 weeks. On the day following the last injection, bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in the proximal tibia to assess systemic osteoporosis and in the distal tibia for periarticular osteoporosis using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Subsequently, bone marrow cells from either end of the tibia were collected and incubated for 7 days before staining and counting tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase positive cells. In the rats with adjuvant arthritis, BMD of either end of the tibia was lower than in normal rats. Although etidronate prevented bone mineral loss at both ends, distal loss was significantly less than proximal. In contrast, alendronate significantly inhibited mineral loss primarily in the proximal area. Large osteoclasts, defined as having five or more nuclei, formed preferentially in the proximal tibia, while small osteoclasts with fewer than four nuclei were found mainly distally. The suppressive effect of alendronate was greater on the large osteoclasts, while etidronate had a greater effect on the small osteoclasts. These results show that the size and multinuclearity of osteoclasts and the number of osteoclasts formed are different in the distal and proximal areas of the tibia, and that alendronate and etidronate may suppress different types of osteoclasts as discriminated by the number of nuclei.

Key words

Adjuvant arthritis rat, Amino bisphosphonate, Non-amino bisphosphonate, Osteoclast, Osteoporosis


Copyright Japan College of Rheumatology All rights reserved.